A history of the dispute between the nazis and the national socialist german workers in germany

Who voted for the Nazis? Dick Richard Geary sums up the latest research into the voting patterns of the German people in the crucial years that brought Hitler to power. It had won no more than 2. The Reichstag election of July saw even more spectacular success:

A history of the dispute between the nazis and the national socialist german workers in germany

And 2 to show why socialism, understood as an economic system based on government ownership of the means of production, positively requires a totalitarian dictatorship. The identification of Nazi Germany as a socialist state was one of the many great contributions of Ludwig von Mises.

Weimar Political Parties | Facing History and Ourselves

When one remembers that the word "Nazi" was an abbreviation for "der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiters Partei — in English translation: For what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled by a party with "socialist" in its name to be but socialism?

Nevertheless, apart from Mises and his readers, practically no one thinks of Nazi Germany as a socialist state. It is far more common to believe that it represented a form of capitalism, which is what the Communists and all other Marxists have claimed.

The basis of the claim that Nazi Germany was capitalist was the fact that most industries in Nazi Germany appeared to be left in private hands.

A history of the dispute between the nazis and the national socialist german workers in germany

What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government.

For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners.

De facto government ownership of the means of production, as Mises termed it, was logically implied by such fundamental collectivist principles embraced by the Nazis as that the common good comes before the private good and the individual exists as a means to the ends of the State.

History turned to ashes after Brazil museum fire

If the individual is a means to the ends of the State, so too, of course, is his property. Just as he is owned by the State, his property is also owned by the State.

But what specifically established de facto socialism in Nazi Germany was the introduction of price and wage controls in These were imposed in response to the inflation of the money supply carried out by the regime from the time of its coming to power in early The Nazi regime inflated the money supply as the means of financing the vast increase in government spending required by its programs of public works, subsidies, and rearmament.

The price and wage controls were imposed in response to the rise in prices that began to result from the inflation. The effect of the combination of inflation and price and wage controls is shortages, that is, a situation in which the quantities of goods people attempt to buy exceed the quantities available for sale.

Shortages, in turn, result in economic chaos. Shortages result in chaos throughout the economic system. They introduce randomness in the distribution of supplies between geographical areas, in the allocation of a factor of production among its different products, in the allocation of labor and capital among the different branches of the economic system.

In the face of the combination of price controls and shortages, the effect of a decrease in the supply of an item is not, as it would be in a free market, to raise its price and increase its profitability, thereby operating to stop the decrease in supply, or reverse it if it has gone too far.

Price control prohibits the rise in price and thus the increase in profitability. At the same time, the shortages caused by price controls prevent increases in supply from reducing price and profitability.

A history of the dispute between the nazis and the national socialist german workers in germany

When there is a shortage, the effect of an increase in supply is merely a reduction in the severity of the shortage. Only when the shortage is totally eliminated does an increase in supply necessitate a decrease in price and bring about a decrease in profitability.

As a result, the combination of price controls and shortages makes possible random movements of supply without any effect on price and profitability. In this situation, the production of the most trivial and unimportant goods, even pet rocks, can be expanded at the expense of the production of the most urgently needed and important goods, such as life-saving medicines, with no effect on the price or profitability of either good.

Price controls would prevent the production of the medicines from becoming more profitable as their supply decreased, while a shortage even of pet rocks prevented their production from becoming less profitable as their supply increased.

As Mises showed, to cope with such unintended effects of its price controls, the government must either abolish the price controls or add further measures, namely, precisely the control over what is produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it is distributed, which I referred to earlier.

The combination of price controls with this further set of controls constitutes the de facto socialization of the economic system.

For it means that the government then exercises all of the substantive powers of ownership. This was the socialism instituted by the Nazis. And Mises calls it socialism on the German or Nazi pattern, in contrast to the more obvious socialism of the Soviets, which he calls socialism on the Russian or Bolshevik pattern.

Of course, socialism does not end the chaos caused by the destruction of the price system. And if it is introduced without the prior existence of price controls, its effect is to inaugurate that very chaos.

This is because socialism is not actually a positive economic system. It is merely the negation of capitalism and its price system. As such, the essential nature of socialism is one and the same as the economic chaos resulting from the destruction of the price system by price and wage controls.'Holofraud' Many Brazilians were enraged by the assertion that the Nazi party was a right-wing movement, pointing to its official name, the National Socialist German Workers' Party, as evidence.

National Socialist rule and the Nazi devised crime of the Holocaust were singular, “a real crime against humanity.” Immeasurable suffering was the result in many countries, “also in Germany.

Aug 10,  · Because the Nazi (national Socialist German workers party) has a Derogatory term for a person who is fanatically dedicated to, or seeks to control, some activity, practice, etc.

Communism on the other is on favoring collectivism in a classless society and private ownership of nationwidesecretarial.com: Resolved. Contrary to myth, Germany was a socialist state, not a capitalist one, writes George Reisman.

Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian. 0 Views. the National Socialist German Workers' Party — Mises's identification might not appear all that noteworthy.

For what should one expect the economic system of a country ruled. "Between and , the National Socialist German Workers Party (NSDAP=National-sozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, or “Nazi” Party for short) became .

National Socialist German Workers Party (NSDAP-Nazi) The National Socialist German Workers Party (NSDAP-Nazi), founded in as the German Workers party, began its move toward prominence when Adolf Hitler emerged as its principal speaker and leader.

Yahoo ist jetzt Teil von Oath