An argument about electoral college as the best method for electing the president in the 21st centur

It is composed of the heads of executive departments chosen by the president with the consent of the Senate, but the members do not hold seats in Congress, and their tenure, like that… Duties of the office The Constitution succinctly defines presidential functions, powers, and responsibilities. Presidents appoint all cabinet heads and most other high-ranking officials of the executive branch of the federal government. They also nominate all judges of the federal judiciary, including the members of the Supreme Court.

An argument about electoral college as the best method for electing the president in the 21st centur

The Electoral College an electoral device that makes the election of the President an indirect one. There are votes and are needed for a majority. This is a relevant question as an alternative to the Electoral College, a National Popular Vote bill, has been passed by 11 jurisdictions representing Electoral College votes.

Duties of the office

Arguments that support the question are that it preserves the voice of small states and it has largely been successful over the years. One argument that supports the idea that the Electoral College is by far the best method of electing the US President is that it has largely been successful over the years.

An argument about electoral college as the best method for electing the president in the 21st centur

Another argument that supports the idea that the Electoral College is by far the best method of electing the US President involves it preserving the voice of small states.

Thanks to the Electoral College, small states are still represented and are not marginalised in favour of the big states. They still play a key and prominent role in deciding the President of the US. This supports the view that the Electoral College is by far the best method of the electing the US President because it preserves the voice of the small states who would otherwise be marginalised in favour of the big states.

In the UK, all constituencies have equal representation. However, while there are some arguments in favour of the Electoral College, there are far more criticisms of it. One is that it leads to a distortion of the popular vote. InObama won It makes a candidate seem more popular than he is.

A further argument that disagrees with the view that the Electoral College is by far the best method of electing the US President is it causing an over representation of small states. This means that small states are being represented at the expense of big states who are arguably more important thanks to their greater populations and economic output.

Bigger states represent more people and arguably should be more prevelant in the Electoral College. Another argument that disagrees with the view that the Electoral College is by far the best method of electing the US President is that it is unfair to third parties. Because of the winner takes all system, candidates whose votes are spread across the country do not perform well in the Electoral College.

Subsequently, this leads to the major party dominating and third parties not being heard. This evidence disagrees with the view that the Electoral College s by far the best method of electing the US President as because of the winner takes all system, third parties are marginalised.

- The Washington Post

A final argument that disagrees with the question is that Electoral College leads to safe states who are ignored because a candidate knows he can depend on that states support. As a result, the election comes down to a few swing states and the majority of states are ignored.

This is also a problem in the UK.

An argument about electoral college as the best method for electing the president in the 21st centur

In conclusion, the Electoral College being argued as the best method of electing the US President is a widely debated topic. There are valid arguments on both sides but arguments against the Electoral College outweigh the arguments in favour of the Electoral College and as a result, it is not the best method.

Despite this, reform is unlikely to change because the Electoral College has constitutional status and there is lack of concensus on what the alternative should be. Despite its criticisms, the electoral college will remain for the foreseeable future Advertisements.It has been argued that despite criticisms, the Electoral College is by far the best method of electing the US President.

The Electoral College an electoral device that makes the election of the President an indirect one. There are votes and are needed for a majority. This is a relevant question as an. In defense of the electoral college. an extraordinary amount of argument on the electoral college, and it was by no means one-sided.

college and the method of electing a president never. Electing Presidents by states' votes, rather than individuals' votes, creates a method of electing a President who is a good compromise candidate for the majority of Americans The Electoral. Arguments against the Electoral College A third way of electing a minority president is if a third party or candidate, however small, drew total.

Far from being unusual, this sort of thing has, in fact, happened 15 times including (in this century) Wilson in both and , Truman in , Kennedy in , Nixon.

College students first learning about the Electoral College will often defend the system by citing its original purpose: to provide a check on the public in case they make a poor choice for president. The Pro's and Con's of the Electoral College System There have, in its year history, been a number of critics and proposed reforms to the Electoral College system - most of them trying to eliminate it.

A third way of electing a minority president is if a third party or candidate, however small, drew enough votes from the top two that no.

The Electoral College - Pros and Cons